|
|
Re: This Is a Failed *PROOF* that AD never produces a New Digit Sequence!
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 11:38 AM
|
|
On Jan 2, 7:46 am, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
<spamt...@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote:
> In <kbu8cc$ed...@dont-email.me>, on 01/01/2013
> at 06:56 PM, "INFINITY POWER" <infin...@limited.com> said:
>
> >Right! This is VERY TRIVIAL PROOF and points [3] and [4] are
> >TRIVIALLY CORRECT!
> >segment = finite sequence of digits
> >[3] every segment of every finite size can be listed.
> >[4] every SEQUENCE of segments can be listed
> >by induction, a SEQUENCE of SEQUENCE OF DIGITS
> >is a SEQUENCE of DIGITS!
>
> Not even close. What is true is that given a sequence of segments
> there is a sequence that is the concatenation of all of the segments.
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
>
LOL! Seymour is here to take me on!
big bigger even-bigger!
Herc
|
|
