
Re: This Is a Failed *PROOF* that AD never produces a New Digit Sequence!
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 11:38 AM


On Jan 2, 7:46 am, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamt...@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote: > In <kbu8cc$ed...@dontemail.me>, on 01/01/2013 > at 06:56 PM, "INFINITY POWER" <infin...@limited.com> said: > > >Right! This is VERY TRIVIAL PROOF and points [3] and [4] are > >TRIVIALLY CORRECT! > >segment = finite sequence of digits > >[3] every segment of every finite size can be listed. > >[4] every SEQUENCE of segments can be listed > >by induction, a SEQUENCE of SEQUENCE OF DIGITS > >is a SEQUENCE of DIGITS! > > Not even close. What is true is that given a sequence of segments > there is a sequence that is the concatenation of all of the segments. > >  > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> >
LOL! Seymour is here to take me on!
big bigger evenbigger!
Herc

