Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: This Is *PROOF* that AD never produces a New Digit Sequence!
Replies: 12   Last Post: Jan 2, 2013 11:38 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Graham Cooper

Posts: 4,348
Registered: 5/20/10
Re: This Is a Failed *PROOF* that AD never produces a New Digit Sequence!
Posted: Jan 2, 2013 11:38 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Jan 2, 7:46 am, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
<spamt...@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote:
> In <kbu8cc$ed...@dont-email.me>, on 01/01/2013
>    at 06:56 PM, "INFINITY POWER" <infin...@limited.com> said:
>

> >Right!  This is VERY TRIVIAL PROOF and points [3] and [4] are
> >TRIVIALLY  CORRECT!
> >segment = finite sequence of digits
> >[3] every segment of every finite size can be listed.
> >[4] every SEQUENCE of segments can be listed
> >by induction, a SEQUENCE of SEQUENCE OF DIGITS
> >is a SEQUENCE of DIGITS!

>
> Not even close. What is true is that given a sequence of segments
> there is a sequence that is the concatenation of all of the segments.
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT  <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
>



LOL! Seymour is here to take me on!

big bigger even-bigger!


Herc



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.