On Jan 2, 7:19 am, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The distinguishability argument is a deep intuitive argument about the > question of Countability of the reals. It is an argument of mine, it > claims that the truth is that the reals are countable. However it > doesn't claim that this truth can be put in a formal proof.
I have a deep, intuitive argument that 3 equals 7. However, this truth cannot be put in a formal proof.
Unfortunately, the informal argument is just too long to put into a sig-line.
-- Blethering Bill
** The informal argument that 3 equals 7 involves noticing that if