> On 1 Jan., 19:19, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The distinguishability argument is a deep intuitive argument about the >> question of Countability of the reals. It is an argument of mine, it >> claims that the truth is that the reals are countable. However it >> doesn't claim that this truth can be put in a formal proof. > > The distinguishability argument is neither deep nor intuitive.
It is not even an argument, just question-begging.
> And is > not an argument of yours since you do not even understand its > implications. It is simply the basis of the axiom of extensionality. > How should we distinguish elements if they could not be distinguished? > > we arrive finally at: >> >> FINAL CONCLUSION: >> >> The number of all reals is COUNTABLE. > > Of course this would be the result if "countable" was a sensible > notion.
You even know what the result would be if non-sensible notions involved were sensible. Mückenheim, you are either the Greatest Genius Of All Times or one of the greatest idiots.
