Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Distinguishability argument x Cantor's arguments?
Replies: 15   Last Post: Jan 9, 2013 4:32 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 16,235
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Distinguishability argument x Cantor's arguments?
Posted: Jan 3, 2013 9:19 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 2 Jan., 22:19, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote:


> On the other hand Cantor have presented many arguments all of which
> are rigorously formalized in second order logic under full semantics,
> and those arguments PROVED that there are uncountably many reals


that can be distinguished by their finite initial segments.
>
> So which one we to believe?
>
> The answer is Cantor's of course!


So let us believe that uncountably many real numbers can be
distinguished by their countably many finite initial segments, because
no infinite diagonal of a Cantor list can be defined other than by its
finite initial segments (or a finite definition).
>
> Why?


because Cantor by distinguishing real nunbers "proved" the existence
of indistinguishable "real" numbers. (He would rotate in his grave
after reading this.)

> Because Cantor's arguments are very clear, and are formalizable in an
> exact manner, so they are quite understandable and obvious. While the
> distinguishability argument of mine is actually ambiguous and shredded
> in mystery.


No, every sensible formalization requires finite distinguishability.

> The Consideration step in that argument and the analogy of
> that with the Generalization step in that argument is really just an
> intuitive leap nothing more nothing less.
>
> This only demonstrates how common intuition fail at absolute infinity.


This demonstrates that Cantor's argument has created thousands of
matheologians who have a block in their brains.

Regards, WM




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.