Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: fom - 01 - preface
Posted:
Jan 3, 2013 1:23 PM
|
|
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes:
> On 24 Dez., 23:47, Alan Smaill <sma...@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> "Indeed, in his discussion containing his
>> he essentially remarks in passing that every linear number is bounded
>> above by a real number."
>
> Cantor's notion of linearity is this:
This is different from the previous definition you gave us ....
time for smoke and mirrors?
> Sie erwähnen in Ihrem Schreiben die Frage über die aktual unendlich
> kleinen Größen. An mehreren Stellen meiner Arbeit werden Sie die
etc
> Zermelo, the editor of Cantor's work, has not detected any attempt by
> Cantor to cheat.
Of course not;
Cantor made efforts to clarify his proofs.
> Zermelo notes that Cantor's proof is invalid, he does
> not note, however, that multiplying linear magnitudes in Cantor's
> sense would be erroneous or a blatant fraud. That insight has been
> published by you for the first time (and for the last time too, I
> think).
It is just so weird that you regard the mirror image of your
own strategy as "fraudulent". It is not.
> Regards, WM
--
Alan Smaill
|
|
|
|
