Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: fom - 01 - preface
Replies: 1   Last Post: Jan 3, 2013 1:23 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Alan Smaill

Posts: 757
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: fom - 01 - preface
Posted: Jan 3, 2013 1:23 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes:

> On 24 Dez., 23:47, Alan Smaill <sma...@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>

>>    "Indeed, in his discussion containing his
>>     he essentially remarks in passing that every linear number is bounded
>>     above by a real number."

>
> Cantor's notion of linearity is this:


This is different from the previous definition you gave us ....
time for smoke and mirrors?

> Sie erwähnen in Ihrem Schreiben die Frage über die aktual unendlich
> kleinen Größen. An mehreren Stellen meiner Arbeit werden Sie die


etc

> Zermelo, the editor of Cantor's work, has not detected any attempt by
> Cantor to cheat.



Of course not;
Cantor made efforts to clarify his proofs.

> Zermelo notes that Cantor's proof is invalid, he does
> not note, however, that multiplying linear magnitudes in Cantor's
> sense would be erroneous or a blatant fraud. That insight has been
> published by you for the first time (and for the last time too, I
> think).


It is just so weird that you regard the mirror image of your
own strategy as "fraudulent". It is not.

> Regards, WM

--
Alan Smaill



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.