Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals.
Replies: 11   Last Post: Jan 5, 2013 10:30 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 15,737
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals.
Posted: Jan 5, 2013 5:15 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 5 Jan., 17:47, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> On 1/5/2013 6:56 AM, WM wrote:
>

> > Nonsense. A real number need not be given by a string of digits. In
> > most cases that is even impossible. Given is a finite definition like
> > "pi". And this is distinct from all other real numbers.

>
> "pi" is certainly a finite string used as a name.


But it allows to calculate a potentially infinite string. i.e., a
finite string with more than any given number of digits.
>
> Please offer a (Russellian) description that attaches it
> to an idea of number.
>
> And, since you make provability an issue in these matters,
> please show that your description is uniquely distinguishing
> pi from other numbers.


I show it by what you think when reading my pi.
Mathematics is discourse, sending and receiving messages. And I am
sure that you would determine the same sequence of digits as I, if we
used an appropriate formalism, for instance the slowly converging
Gregory-Leibniz.

Regards, WM



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.