
Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals.
Posted:
Jan 5, 2013 5:15 PM


On 5 Jan., 17:47, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > On 1/5/2013 6:56 AM, WM wrote: > > > Nonsense. A real number need not be given by a string of digits. In > > most cases that is even impossible. Given is a finite definition like > > "pi". And this is distinct from all other real numbers. > > "pi" is certainly a finite string used as a name.
But it allows to calculate a potentially infinite string. i.e., a finite string with more than any given number of digits. > > Please offer a (Russellian) description that attaches it > to an idea of number. > > And, since you make provability an issue in these matters, > please show that your description is uniquely distinguishing > pi from other numbers.
I show it by what you think when reading my pi. Mathematics is discourse, sending and receiving messages. And I am sure that you would determine the same sequence of digits as I, if we used an appropriate formalism, for instance the slowly converging GregoryLeibniz.
Regards, WM

