The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals.
Replies: 11   Last Post: Jan 5, 2013 10:30 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,076
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals.
Posted: Jan 5, 2013 5:15 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 5 Jan., 17:47, fom <> wrote:
> On 1/5/2013 6:56 AM, WM wrote:

> > Nonsense. A real number need not be given by a string of digits. In
> > most cases that is even impossible. Given is a finite definition like
> > "pi". And this is distinct from all other real numbers.

> "pi" is certainly a finite string used as a name.

But it allows to calculate a potentially infinite string. i.e., a
finite string with more than any given number of digits.
> Please offer a (Russellian) description that attaches it
> to an idea of number.
> And, since you make provability an issue in these matters,
> please show that your description is uniquely distinguishing
> pi from other numbers.

I show it by what you think when reading my pi.
Mathematics is discourse, sending and receiving messages. And I am
sure that you would determine the same sequence of digits as I, if we
used an appropriate formalism, for instance the slowly converging

Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.