In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 4 Jan., 18:57, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > On 1/4/2013 5:41 AM, WM wrote: > > > >>>> So we are not speaking about the same distinguishability criterion. > > > > > There is no other criterion.
There are others for those who do not live in Wolkenmuekenheim. > > > > In logic, discernibility is taken to be with > > respect to properties. > > Can't a number be considered to be a property?
In his Wolkenmuekenheim, WM can consider anything he pleases. > > > > Your position seems to be that since the names determine > > the model which, in turn, determines the truth, then the > > names are the only criterion. > > The model determines the truth if the rules which have to be obeyed by > the names are taken from observation of reality.
Mathematics takes very little directly from reality, and even that is taken in highly abstracted form. > > Regards, WM --