Virgil
Posts:
4,674
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals.
Posted:
Jan 5, 2013 5:37 PM
|
|
In article
<49c23543-93cb-4fa8-8130-609cabfac2b4@z8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 4 Jan., 18:57, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> > On 1/4/2013 5:41 AM, WM wrote:
>
> > >>>> So we are not speaking about the same distinguishability criterion.
> >
> > > There is no other criterion.
There are others for those who do not live in Wolkenmuekenheim.
> >
> > In logic, discernibility is taken to be with
> > respect to properties.
>
> Can't a number be considered to be a property?
In his Wolkenmuekenheim, WM can consider anything he pleases.
> >
> > Your position seems to be that since the names determine
> > the model which, in turn, determines the truth, then the
> > names are the only criterion.
>
> The model determines the truth if the rules which have to be obeyed by
> the names are taken from observation of reality.
Mathematics takes very little directly from reality, and even that is
taken in highly abstracted form.
>
> Regards, WM
--
|
|
