Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution.
Replies: 5   Last Post: Jan 6, 2013 4:47 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Koobee Wublee Posts: 1,417 Registered: 2/21/06
Re: Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution.
Posted: Jan 5, 2013 6:43 PM

On Jan 5, 5:14 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
> On 04.01.2013 22:49, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> > paul wrote:

Boo! Scare you paul. Koobee Wublee knows you are greatly haunted by
Koobee Wublee. Please relax. <shrug>

> > > http://www.gethome.no/paulba/twins.html
>
> > Good job, paul. You have handed over the material that proves you
> > have no understanding of what the Lorentz transform is all about.
> > <shrug>

>
> > When B is not accelerating, the Lorentz transform says there is no way
> > to tell absolutely who is traveling and who is not. Time dilation
> > should be building up when A observes B as well as when B observes A.
> > The JAVA applet does not reflect what the Lorentz transform says. You
> > may want to decrease the acceleration distance to just 1 and increase
> > acceleration to 2 for a better dramatic effect. <shrug>

>
> > paul?s gross blunder: The mutual time dilation is building up when B
> > is not accelerating. The applet violates the principle of
> > relativity. <shrug>

>
> I won't bother to quibble about your nonsense.
> [rest of whining nonsense snipped]

OK, paul. Koobee Wublee will make you a deal. Why don?t you modify
your JAVA applet and allow both twins to travel with the same
acceleration profile. Please also allow time when both are not
accelerating but with mutual time dilation building up due to relative
speed. With the same acceleration profiles, the effect of that should
cancel out, no? <please>

Date Subject Author
1/4/13 Koobee Wublee
1/5/13 Paul B. Andersen
1/5/13 Koobee Wublee
1/6/13 Paul B. Andersen