The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution.
Replies: 5   Last Post: Jan 6, 2013 4:47 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Koobee Wublee

Posts: 1,417
Registered: 2/21/06
Re: Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution.
Posted: Jan 5, 2013 6:43 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Jan 5, 5:14 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
> On 04.01.2013 22:49, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> > paul wrote:

Boo! Scare you paul. Koobee Wublee knows you are greatly haunted by
Koobee Wublee. Please relax. <shrug>

> > >
> > Good job, paul. You have handed over the material that proves you
> > have no understanding of what the Lorentz transform is all about.
> > <shrug>

> > When B is not accelerating, the Lorentz transform says there is no way
> > to tell absolutely who is traveling and who is not. Time dilation
> > should be building up when A observes B as well as when B observes A.
> > The JAVA applet does not reflect what the Lorentz transform says. You
> > may want to decrease the acceleration distance to just 1 and increase
> > acceleration to 2 for a better dramatic effect. <shrug>

> > paul?s gross blunder: The mutual time dilation is building up when B
> > is not accelerating. The applet violates the principle of
> > relativity. <shrug>

> I won't bother to quibble about your nonsense.
> [rest of whining nonsense snipped]

OK, paul. Koobee Wublee will make you a deal. Why don?t you modify
your JAVA applet and allow both twins to travel with the same
acceleration profile. Please also allow time when both are not
accelerating but with mutual time dilation building up due to relative
speed. With the same acceleration profiles, the effect of that should
cancel out, no? <please>

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.