The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals.
Replies: 11   Last Post: Jan 5, 2013 10:30 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,968
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals.
Posted: Jan 5, 2013 10:30 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 1/5/2013 5:58 PM, Virgil wrote:
> In article
> <>,
> WM <> wrote:

>> On 5 Jan., 22:36, Virgil <> wrote:

>>> Actually, real math suggests that there are reals so incredibly
>>> inaccessible that finding the digit sequence representing one of them is
>>> not possible.
>>> In which case such numbers may well not be "finitely distinguishable".
>>> --

>> And they cannot be used in any way in a discourse or in mathematics or
>> spring off a Cantor-list.
>> So, why talk about them at all?

> Because if they are not there, some of the necessary properties of the
> real number field are also not there.

Yes. These discussions have been leading
that way.

All of us deal with the world relative to
partial information. That is what is actual.
But, to survive one must speculate as to how
independent pieces of information relate to
one another as parts related to a whole.

Apparently, this natural inclination of the
human organism is to be denied in mathematical

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.