Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: From Fermat little theorem to Fermat Last Theorem
Replies: 62   Last Post: Mar 14, 2013 9:59 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Pubkeybreaker Posts: 1,683 Registered: 2/12/07
Re: From Fermat little theorem to Fermat Last Theorem
Posted: Jan 7, 2013 9:01 AM

On Jan 7, 8:18 am, "M_Klemm" <m_f_kl...@t-online.de> wrote:
> "John Jens" wrote
>

> > The reason is to prove FLT .
> > Let's split in three steps :
> > Step 1--> prove a^p + b^p != c^p with a < p ,a,b,c,    naturals
> > Step 2--> extend to rationals , still a < p
> > Step 3--> pick A >= p, assume  A^p + b^p = c^p and scaling down to A/k < p
> > ,k rational -->contradiction to step 2
> > If a + b ? c>0 because 0<a?b<c implies b ? c < 0 ,
> > 0 ? a + b ? c < a < p
> > then a + b ? c ? 1 and because a + b ? c < a implies a ? 2 and because a <
> > p implies p > 2 ...
> > .... and using binomial theorem

>
> Is this intended to be a proof of step 1?
> If yes, it is essentially correct, because a^p + b^p = c^p together with a <
> p implies
> a^p + b^p <= a + b^p < p + b^p < (b+1)^p <= c^p, a contradiction.
>
> The inequality (b+1)^p <= c^p is however not necessaryly true for rational b
> and c with b < c.
>
> Regards
> Michael

I have already told him that regardless of the details of what he is
doing
that his proof CAN NOT work. I gave the reasons why.

But of course, like all cranks, he just ignores the reviews from
experts
and just prattles on.

Date Subject Author
11/27/12 John Jens
11/27/12 quasi
11/27/12 John Jens
11/27/12 quasi
11/27/12 Pubkeybreaker
11/28/12 John Jens
11/28/12 quasi
11/28/12 John Jens
11/28/12 Frederick Williams
11/28/12 John Jens
11/29/12 David Bernier
11/29/12 Michael Stemper
11/28/12 Ki Song
11/28/12 John Jens
11/28/12 gus gassmann
11/28/12 John Jens
11/28/12 Ki Song
11/28/12 quasi
11/29/12 Pubkeybreaker
11/28/12 John Jens
11/28/12 quasi
12/1/12 vrut25@gmail.com
12/2/12 John Jens
12/2/12 quasi
12/2/12 quasi
12/29/12 John Jens
12/29/12 J. Antonio Perez M.
12/30/12 John Jens
1/5/13 John Jens
1/5/13 J. Antonio Perez M.
1/5/13 John Jens
1/6/13 Michael Klemm
1/6/13 John Jens
1/6/13 Michael Klemm
1/7/13 John Jens
1/7/13 Michael Klemm
1/7/13 Pubkeybreaker
1/7/13 John Jens
1/7/13 Bart Goddard
1/7/13 Michael Klemm
1/7/13 John Jens
1/7/13 Michael Klemm
1/7/13 John Jens
1/7/13 Michael Klemm
3/7/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/14/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
12/29/12 quasi
12/30/12 John Jens
12/30/12 quasi
12/30/12 John Jens
12/30/12 quasi
12/31/12 John Jens
12/31/12 quasi
12/31/12 quasi
1/2/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
1/4/13 John Jens
1/4/13 quasi
1/4/13 John Jens
12/30/12 Pubkeybreaker
12/30/12 John Jens
12/30/12 Pubkeybreaker
11/27/12 wheretogo