Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: A size criterion: a question
Replies: 15   Last Post: Jan 9, 2013 1:22 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 9,012
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: A size criterion: a question
Posted: Jan 7, 2013 4:22 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<c3420f76-2140-4e9e-94aa-4dc82f3a8695@n5g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 7 Jan., 19:18, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> > > In fact, it's consistent with ZF that there are sets x and y such that
> > > both |x| > |y| and |y| = |x|.

> >
> > True, but not in this extension of ZF!
> >

>
> True, e.g., for indistinguishable reals.
> If you can't distinguish them, you cannot prove that they are more
> than the rationals. |R| = |Q|.
> But if you believe that they exists independently as different numbers
> (although nobody can prove it), then |R| > |Q|.
>
> Regards, WM


Again, WM is missing the point. Te properties of |x| > |y| and |y| = |x|
depend on the definitions of |x| > |y| and |y| = |x|, and the definition
that Butch and Zuhair re discussing is not the standard one, so that WM
again does not know what he is talking abaout
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.