Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
fl
Posts:
75
Registered:
10/8/05
|
|
Re: Question about linear algebra matrix p-norm
Posted:
Jan 8, 2013 6:17 PM
|
|
On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 5:49:54 PM UTC-5, quasi wrote: > On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:30:19 -0500, quasi <quasi@null.set> wrote: > > > > >fll <rxjwg98@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>quasi wrote: > > >>> rxjwg98@gmail.com wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> >Hi, > > >>> > > > >>> >I am reading a book on matrix characters. It has a lemma on > > >>> >matrix p-norm. I do not understand a short explaination in > > >>> >its proof part. > > >>> > > > >>> >The Lemma is: If F is Rnxn and |F|p<1 (p-norm of F), then > > >>> > > > >>> >I-F is non-singular.... > > >>> > > > >>> >In its proof part, it says: Suppose I-F is singular. It > > >>> > > > >>> >follows that (I-F)x=0 for some nonzero x. But then > > >>> > > > >>> >|x|p=|Fx|p implies |F|p>=1, a contradiction. Thus, I-F > > >>> > > > >>> >is nonsingular. > > >>> > > > >>> >My question is about how it gets: > > >>> > > > >>> >But then |x|p=|Fx|p implies |F|p>=1 > > >>> > > > >>> >Could you tell me that? Thanks a lot > > >>> > > >>>It's an immediate consequence of the definition of the matrix > > >>> > > >>>p-norm. By definition, > > >>> > > >>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_norm> > > >>> > > >>> |F|p = max (|Fx|p)/(|x|p) > > >>> > > >>> where the maximum is taken over all nonzero vectors x. > > >>> > > >>> Thus, |F|p < 1 implies > > >>> > > >>> (|Fx|p)/(|x|p) < 1 for all nonzero vectors x, > > >>> > > >>> But if I - F was singular, then, as you indicate, F would > > >>> have a nonzero fixed point x, say. > > >>> > > >>> Then > > >>> > > >>> Fx = x > > >>> > > >>> => |Fx|p = |x|p > > >>> > > >>> => (|Fx|p)/(|x|p) = 1, > > >>> > > >>> contradiction. > > >> > > >>You get > > >>(|Fx|p)/(|x|p) = 1, > > >> > > >>but the book says: > > >>|x|p=|Fx|p implies |F|p>=1 > > >> > > >>I cannot get > > >>|F|p>=1 > > > > > >Note that for any nonzero n x n matrix F over the reals, and > > >any real p >= 1, the p-norm of F exists and is a positive real > > >number (just consider the values of F restricted to the > > >standard unit (n-1)-sphere). > > > > A few more details to support the above claim ... > > > > Consider the function f: (R^n)\{0} -> R defined by > > > > f(v) = |Fv|p/|v|p > > > > Clearly f(v) >= 0 for all v. > > > > Let g the restriction of f to > > > > {v : |v| = 1} > > > > where |v| is the 2-norm of v. In other words, g is the > > restriction of f to the standard unit (n-1)-sphere. > > > > Clearly, for any positive real number c, > > > > f(cv) = f(v) > > > > hence, the range of f is the same as the range of g. > > > > But g is a continuous real-valued function with a compact > > domain, hence the range of g is compact. It follows that > > g, and hence also f, has a maximum value. Since f(v) >= 0 > > for all v, and since F is nonzero, the maximum value of > > f must be positive. > > > > Therefore |F|p exists and is a positive real number. > > > > >As observed in my previous reply, singularity of I - F implies > > > > > > (|Fx|p)/(|x|p) = 1 > > > > > >for some nonzero vector x. > > > > > >Hence the maximum value of > > > > > > (|Fv|p)/(|v|p) > > > > > >over all nonzero vectors v must be at least one. > > > > > >Therefore |F|p >= 1. > > > > quasi
Thank you very much. It is clear to me now.
I do not understand the symbol \{0}. Could you explain it to me?
............. Consider the function f: (R^n)\{0} -> R defined by
|
|
|
|