Repetative cycles are not the thing that I personally have an issue with... John Nash is an example of someone who does not play well with others so who can turn the tables on him? He has to be on a team so what role objectifies him? What is or constitutes a progressive cycle with him? A linear progression implies a default regression. John Nash objectifies a default regression... The issue with me is that I don't convey gratitude for failure. Russia always wins because Russia never fails. What I need is to find the track that leads to a success progression... Two consecutive success progressions will put me on the track to success in life... That much is out of my hands... I have the precursurs to full blown ALS... The world's priority, apparently, is to instill full blown ALS in me on the next complete cycle of the world's repetative cycle. If that is the only thing the world wants to prove then all I can say is that I need money!! Give me some MONEY and we'll work on your issues at a later date... 'k?
When it comes to pattern and structure then the pattern and structure suggests that all of the computing world's toolkits are stored in my brain... I cored the internet in 1995... It isn't like I wanted to core the internet in 1995... For whatever reason, the internet wants me to be in the loop. I am the recycle bin... I may not be the only recycle bin that you have but if you want to recycle anything that is grey, then you need my input.
John Nash has a toolkit and that toolkit is 'the eternal hallway'... John Nash has to have a partner for the sake of the eternal hallway... A curtain must be constructed over the CERN complex for the sake of preserving John Nash's toolkit... Ya see, if it turns out that John Nash is simply too feeble to build anything with his toolkit, then I have to find a way to agree with him regarding CERN since, if the eternal hallway isn't his toolkit then it must be my toolkit by default.