On 10 Jan., 19:11, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 10, 9:08 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > > > On 10 Jan., 18:47, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Your binary tree have UNCOUNTABLY many paths each defined as a > sequence of labels of its NODES, even though it has countably many > nodes. That's what you are not getting. Anyhow.
I would easily get it if you could identify a path that supports your assertion by being identified by nodes. Prove your claim by identifying a path that is missing and tell me by what combination of nodes you identified it. Unless you cannot do that I think that your babbling about more than countably many paths is of the same quality as your babbling about Cantor's statements, which you obviously have never read, let alone understood.