|
|
Re: FAILURE OF THE DISTINGUISHABILITY ARGUMENT. THE TRIUMPH OF
CANTOR: THE REALS ARE UNCOUNTABLE!
Posted:
Jan 10, 2013 2:12 PM
|
|
On 10 Jan., 19:11, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 10, 9:08 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 10 Jan., 18:47, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Your binary tree have UNCOUNTABLY many paths each defined as a
> sequence of labels of its NODES, even though it has countably many
> nodes. That's what you are not getting. Anyhow.
I would easily get it if you could identify a path that supports your
assertion by being identified by nodes. Prove your claim by
identifying a path that is missing and tell me by what combination of
nodes you identified it. Unless you cannot do that I think that your
babbling about more than countably many paths is of the same quality
as your babbling about Cantor's statements, which you obviously have
never read, let alone understood.
Regards, WM
|
|
