On Jan 9, 4:55 pm, M Purcell <sacsca...@aol.com> wrote: > On Jan 9, 10:32 am, Kevin <barry196...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Repetative cycles are not the thing that I personally have an issue > > with... John Nash is an example of someone who does not play well with > > others so who can turn the tables on him? He has to be on a team so > > what role objectifies him? What is or constitutes a progressive cycle > > with him? A linear progression implies a default regression. John Nash > > objectifies a default regression... The issue with me is that I don't > > convey gratitude for failure. Russia always wins because Russia never > > fails. What I need is to find the track that leads to a success > > progression... Two consecutive success progressions will put me on the > > track to success in life... That much is out of my hands... I have the > > precursurs to full blown ALS... The world's priority, apparently, is > > to instill full blown ALS in me on the next complete cycle of the > > world's repetative cycle. If that is the only thing the world wants to > > prove then all I can say is that I need money!! Give me some MONEY and > > we'll work on your issues at a later date... 'k? > > > When it comes to pattern and structure then the pattern and structure > > suggests that all of the computing world's toolkits are stored in my > > brain... I cored the internet in 1995... It isn't like I wanted to > > core the internet in 1995... For whatever reason, the internet wants > > me to be in the loop. I am the recycle bin... I may not be the only > > recycle bin that you have but if you want to recycle anything that is > > grey, then you need my input. > > > John Nash has a toolkit and that toolkit is 'the eternal hallway'... > > John Nash has to have a partner for the sake of the eternal hallway... > > A curtain must be constructed over the CERN complex for the sake of > > preserving John Nash's toolkit... Ya see, if it turns out that John > > Nash is simply too feeble to build anything with his toolkit, then I > > have to find a way to agree with him regarding CERN since, if the > > eternal hallway isn't his toolkit then it must be my toolkit by > > default. > > And you can't use your toolkit?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
My toolkit ties me in with Hawking and by extension, my eyes have such complex character that it is impossible for glass to cut them... I have to cut my ties with Hawking since I share Nash's toolkit... Nash is important given my provanance for three body problem so it's like I don't control anything if he is anything that approaches being cooperative.