Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Why is it you Guys NEVER ACTUALLY CALCULATE a Real Anti-Diagonal ??
Replies: 15   Last Post: Jan 11, 2013 10:30 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Graham Cooper

Posts: 4,262
Registered: 5/20/10
Re: Why is it you Guys NEVER ACTUALLY CALCULATE a Real Anti-Diagonal ??
Posted: Jan 10, 2013 8:32 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Jan 11, 5:10 am, Daryl McCullough <stevendaryl3...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 4:09:22 AM UTC-5, INFINITY POWER wrote:
> > ******CHALLENGE TO LECTURER GEORGE GREENE*******
>
> > LIST
>
> >   R1=  0.314159265358979323 ...
>
> >   R2=  0.2718281828459045235360 ...
>
> >   R3=  0.333333333333333333 ...
>
> >   R4=  0.888888888888888888888888 ...
>
> >   R5=  0.0123456789012345678901234 ...
>
> >   R6=  0.14142135623730950488 ...
>
> You have spent, apparently, years not understanding the Cantor argument,
> which a normal person takes approximately 10 minutes to 1 hour
> understanding. So your mathematical abilities are less than 10^{-5}
> times as great as a normal person's. Just a rough estimate.


I posted CANTORS PROOF DEMO

exactly the same as this proof.

You accept ONE ANTIDIAGONAL FORMULA

but when given the SET of ADs you say it's not a valid proof method.

Herc



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.