
Re: Why is it you Guys NEVER ACTUALLY CALCULATE a Real AntiDiagonal ??
Posted:
Jan 11, 2013 10:30 PM


On Jan 12, 1:13 pm, Daryl McCullough <stevendaryl3...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Cantor's proof says that for any infinite sequence of reals, there is another > real that is not on that list. You didn't give an infinite sequence of reals, > so there is really nothing to refute. But for definiteness, the real > > 0.101001000100001000001... > > is not on your list.
*********THIS IS/WAS YOUR PROOF********
A SUBLIST OF REALS IN [BASE 4] R1 0.0000... R2 0.3333... R3 0.3210... ...
DIAGONAL = 0.031...
DEFINE AD(d) = 2 IFF DIAGONAL(d) < 2 AD(d) = 1 IFF DIAGONAL(d) > 1 AD=0.212... is MISSING FROM THE LIST
PROOF DIGIT 1 (2) IS DIFFERENT TO LIST[1,1] (0) DIGIT 2 (1) IS DIFFERENT TO LIST[2,2] (3) DIGIT 3 (2) IS DIFFERENT TO LIST[3,3] (1) AND SO ON
So AD is DIFFERENT to EVERY ROW since This Holds For Any Arbitrary List Of Reals there is a missing Real for any List Of Reals therefore Reals are UnCountable!

