|
|
HACNS1 gene; mistakes of logic by Paabo & Green #187 Rockthrowing
theory book
Posted:
Jan 11, 2013 11:12 PM
|
|
On Jan 10, 6:18 am, benj <b...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:33:28 -0800, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> It's called "politics", Archie.
Do not overlook the intrusion of religion in Neanderthal research.
Mistakes of logic by Svante Paabo and Ed Green #187 Rockthrowing
theory book
Now I was looking for the transcript because I remember there was a
third scientist involved and confused with logical reasoning. The
third scientist layed out some red beads on the geography table and
piled the beads up in Tuscany Italy saying that the Tuscany is the
hotbed of Neanderthal and Homo sapiens interbreeding.
Now the logical flaws of Paabo and Green are very evident in that they
focused on just one gene FOXP2 and when they found the gene identical
in Sapiens and Neanderthal, they could no longer support their pet
belief that the difference between the two species was communication,
that the Neanderthal did not have a robust communication.
So then, what does Paabo and Green do? Well, they then go on a
interbreeding escapade for the Neanderthals with the Sapiens.
Trouble is that, earlier Paabo had shown the world audience that
Neanderthal was a different species than Sapiens, but now, here that
FOXP2 was not changed, Paabo with Green go on an interbreeding binge.
So how can biology scientists of Paabo and Green one year claim
different species and when their pet theory falls apart, they then
embrace the contradiction of interbreeding, yet they are different
species.
So the importance of what the third scientist (was it Hawks?) the one
that showed red beads piled on Tuscany Italy. The importance of that,
is that the genes proffered as different from sapiens genes and
different from African genes, is that Paabo, Green, and Hawks (if it
was Hawks since the transcript is not available). The trouble with
their silly assertion that those were Neanderthal
interbreeding genes, is that the obvious is more likely to have
happened. That in the long years of Africans moving north into
Neanderthal territory, that some of those groups or tribes developed
mutations in those 10,000 years which was located near Tuscany Italy
and that those mutations are what we now see as different from the
African homo sapiens.
So the mistake of Paabo and Green and (Hawks if it was Hawks) is that
they are thinking those genetic changes were due to Neanderthal
interbreeding when in all likely hood, those new genes were mutations
of the Homo sapiens around Tuscany and not due to any Neanderthal
interbreeding.
But the biggest and gravest mistake of Paabo and Green is that once
they realized FOXP2 was identical in Neanderthal and Sapiens, they
should have dropped their silly and stupid theory of communication and
focused on the major important gene-- HACNS1 which directs the ability
of rock throwing.
Noonan is a better qualified scientist than is Paabo or Green to speak
about Neanderthal in future NOVA shows.
Perhaps people do not like to be told that our ancestors were horrible
and merciless killers of another species, and how they mercilessly
stone thrown to death the Neanderthals. People of religion probably do
not like the idea that
what made us human was killing of other animals by means of throwing
rocks and stones. People like Paabo and others want to sanitize and
cleanse the ancestors of humans as communication species, but that is
not science, that is not the truth and not what happened. What did
happen was that an ape, some 8 to 10 million years ago started
throwing rocks and stones that conferred superb advantage to that
individual in killing rivals, in killing food and having more mates
and more offspring.
Give the job of spokesman for the next NOVA on Neanderthal, give that
to Noonan to be the lead researcher for we need to know about HACNS1,
not the pathetic FOXP2.
--
Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-
bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and
fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium
?http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
?where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
|
