> I now have a proof that there are no cycles other than the trivial (1,2) > cycle for the Collatz function on the positive integers. I have replaced > my previous paper (the flawed proof of the Collatz conjecture) with this > new paper at the same link. > > I am continuing to meet with my colleagues and discuss the matter. As > always, I would appreciate any and all comments, even if you just want > to call me a "delusional crank" again.
You're delusional to think this group remembers your precious link.