In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 14 Jan., 23:09, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > It is sets of nodes and sets of paths which are missing, not merely > > individual nodes or paths. And which paths are be missing cannot be > > determined without a list of those paths which are included. > > So you deny that mathematics of numbers is based upon digits.
I have no idea what you mean, when I am talking about something the does not require any numbers, except possibly as tags or names. > > But here is the list: All finite initial segments of all decimal > expansions are included.
That is not a list. And for paths in a Complete Infinite Binary Tree, decimal expansions are totally irrelevant and contra indicated.
So that WM is totally off base, again, as usual! --