Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.
|
|
Paul
Posts:
729
Registered:
7/12/10
|
|
Re: Property related to denseness
Posted:
Jan 16, 2013 5:13 AM
|
|
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 6:53:50 PM UTC, Michael Stemper wrote:
> In article <a1044dfe-77d8-45e8-9f6f-307894d02c86@u19g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, Butch Malahide <fred.galvin@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >On Jan 14, 12:55=A0pm, mstem...@walkabout.empros.com (Michael Stemper) wrote:
>
> >> In article <d2c170e4-b59b-4c73-8a73-24374fc8b6e1@googlegroups.com>, Paul <pepste...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
> >> >Let A be a subset of the topological space of X.
>
> >> >What is the standard terminology for the property
>
> >> > that X =3D the intersection of all the open sets that contain A?
>
> >>
>
> >> The trivial topology?
>
> >>
>
> >> If these two Xs refer to the same thing, then I don't see how X could be
>
> >> the intersection of more than one subset of X, and I don't see how that
>
> >> subset could be anything other than X.
>
> >
>
> >Yes, the OP's property that "X =3D the intersection of all the open sets
>
> >that contain A" could be stated more simply as "X is the only open set
>
> >that contains A". This is, of course, a property of a subset A of a
>
> >topological space X.
>
>
>
> Okay, thanks for validating my thinking.
>
>
>
> > By "the trivial topology" I guess you mean the
>
> >"indiscrete" topology,
>
>
>
> Willard also uses that term. It makes sense that if the finest topology
>
> is called "discrete" that the coarsest could be called "indiscrete".
>
>
Not just Willard but "indiscrete" is the standard term I would think. I think that a trivial object would be one that is embedded in all objects of the same type. For example, the trivial group is the group with one element. If there is such a thing as "the trivial topology [without mentioning the underlying set]" then that might be the topology on the empty set where the only open set is the empty set.
If the underlying set is X, then I would think "The trivial topology on X" is a fine way of describing the indiscrete topology, since the open sets in that topology on X are exactly the sets that are open in every topology on X. So it's analogous to the "trivial group".
Is "trivial topology on X" a standard way of referring to the indiscrete topology on X? If not, I think it should be.
Paul Epstein
|
|
|
|
