bacle
Posts:
839
From:
nyc
Registered:
6/6/10
|
|
Re: Germanic Trash plutonium's Worthless Life. .
Posted:
Jan 16, 2013 10:30 AM
|
|
> NOVA tonight showed another episode of Neanderthal
> research. A lot of
> good new information, but overall it was a
> disappointing update
> because of the total lack of discussion of the
> central and key gene
> involved-- HACNS1.
>
> What do you call it in mathematics, or logic or
> science when you
> should talk about the key issue, but never talk about
> the key issue?
It is neither, you worthless fucking baboon.
How do you call it when you repeatedly dump off-topic trash in sci.math?
> Is it irresponsible? Is it illogical? Is it being a
> incompetent
> scientist?
>
> In this episode, one of the lead researchers, Svante
> Paabo is seen as
> more irresponsible rather than a logical scientist,
> for his constant
> incessant focus on FOXP2 gene for language, when a
> better scientist
> would have said, "drop that gene" and focus on HACNS1
> gene as what
> made humanity and extincted the Neanderthals.
>
> Perhaps the NOVA crew and Paabo realize that
> rockthrowing extincted
> the Neanderthals and are trying to soften that
> horrible and ugly
> extinction by painting the Neanderthal as having
> interbred with the
> Homo sapiens.
>
> There probably was some interbreeding, but the main
> idea is that the
> Neanderthals throwing abilities were so inferior to
> Homo sapiens that
> Homo neanderthals were extincted by the constant
> throwing attacks upon
> them. Some of the Neanderthal women were probably
> carried away and
> interbred, but the men, who could not throw as well
> as the Homo
> sapiens were all mercilessly stone thrown to death.
> Maybe we never
> want to admit our horrible and grisly past even when
> the facts come in
> as such. But that is not responsible science. Science
> must always tell
> the truth and full truth.
>
> Instead of focusing on the genes of language and
> speech or the genes
> of immunology, the HLA immune system genes, it is
> irresponsible of
> Svante Paabo to discuss Neanderthal and neglect the
> HACNS1 gene.
>
> When your ideas turn out to be false in science, you
> should have at
> least the grace to indicate where the major
> difference is between the
> Neanderthal and the Homo sapiens-- and that
> difference is in throwing.
> So forget about the FOXP2 gene and talk about the
> HACNS1 gene.
>
> I recommend that Paabo never again have a spot in
> NOVA on Neanderthal
> and instead interview Noonan as to the latest
> information on HACNS1
> gene.
>
> The last time I wrote on this textbook was March of
> 2011
> and now it is January of 2013. Looks like I need to
> do a new edition
> of this book Rockthrowing for it consolidates and
> unifies the entire
> science of Anthropology.
>
> Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo, sci.anthropology,
> sci.math,
> sci.physics
> From: Archimedes Plutonium
> <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:24:33 -0800 (PST)
> Local: Mon, Mar 7 2011 3:24 pm
> Subject: Homo sapiens has 16-13 = 3 mutations on
> HACNS1 that
> Neanderthal does not have #183 Rockthrowing theory
> book
> (snipped)
>
> Newsgroups: sci.math, sci.physics
> From: Archimedes Plutonium
> <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:29:32 -0800 (PST)
> Local: Wed, Mar 9 2011 3:29 pm
> Subject: Physics and Math completes the science of
> Anthropology with
> its HACNS1 ; book #184 Rockthrowing theory (sic)
> Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print |
> Individual message | Show
> original | Remove | Report this message | Find
> messages by this author
> Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo, sci.anthropology,
> sci.math,
> sci.physics
> From: Archimedes Plutonium
> <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:24:33 -0800 (PST)
> Local: Mon, Mar 7 2011 3:24 pm
> Subject: Homo sapiens has 16-13 = 3 mutations on
> HACNS1 that
> Neanderthal does not have #183 Rockthrowing theory
> book
> Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print |
> Individual message | Show
> original | Remove | Report this message | Find
> messages by this
> author
> Now my math and physics counting abilities offers me
> the fact that 16
> subtract 13 is 3, for ?3 mutations or alterations.
> Now maybe Messr
> Noonan and Paabo have ?some ?different sort ?of
> mathematics when they
> are doing anthropology? ?Last time I spoke on this
> subject was 2010,
> Aug 4, 1:27 am to this ?book of Rockthrowing ?as the
> central theory
> for evolving the human ?species out of the ape
> ?ancestors. I spoke of
> how the science of ?Anthropology was a science in
> closure or the last
> phases of finding ?out ?its history, where the main
> parts are solved
> and only details ?remain ?to tell the story. The main
> parts being, of
> course that some 8 ?to 10 ?million years ago some ape
> had a
> proclivity ?of picking up ?rocks and throwing them
> for his advantage.
> Advantage in ?gaining more ?food and mates and thus
> more children who
> had the same ?proclivity of ?throwing stones and
> rocks. ?As these
> rockthrowers increased in numbers ?there genetic
> mutations ?favoring
> even better ?abilities of throwing ?caused them to
> become bipedal and
> more focused ?on even better ?throwing. ?In the end,
> these
> rockthrowers extincted all other human ?type species
> ?such as the
> Neanderthals who although were able to ?throw, just
> failed ?to have
> enough throwing abilities ?of Cro Magnon ?that would
> become Homo
> sapiens. Neanderthal genetics ?were inferior to ?the
> ?throwing
> genetics of CroMagnon. ?It was a long time in coming
> for ?the
> Neanderthal Genome was reported: ?--- quoting from
> http://genome.cshlp.org/content/20/5/547.full
> ?Neanderthal genomics
> and the evolution of modern humans ?James P. Noonan
> ?(B) Value of
> Neanderthal genome sequence for dating functionally
> ?relevant human-
> specific substitutions, using the HACNS1 enhancer as
> ?an ?example.
> (Top) HACNS1 is located in an intron of AGAP1 and
> downstream ?of GBX2
> on human chromosome 2. (Bottom) The 13 human-specific
> ?substitutions
> implicated in the human-specific gain of function in
> ?this element.
> --- end quoting of Noonan --- ?Now maybe I am not
> understanding the
> report, but from what I gather ?from these reports
> ?of 16 mutations
> of ?Homo sapiens compared to only 13 mutations on
> ?Neanderthal for
> the ?HACNS1: ? 1. Comment on
> "Human-Specific Gain of
> Function ?in a ?Developmental ...by L Duret - 2009 -
> Cited by 13 -
> Related ?articles ? 2. Feb 6, 2009 ...
> Second, among the
> 16 ?substitutions in ?HACNS1 there ?are 14 AT ? GC
> substitutions , 2
> GC ? ?CG substitutions, but not a ?single GC ? AT ...
> ? 3.
> www.sciencemag.org/lookup/resid/323/5915/714c?view=fu
> ll&uritype...
> ? 4. Human-Specific Gain of Function in a
> Developmental
> Enhancer ...by ?S Prabhakar - 2008 - Cited by 52 -
> Related articles
> ? 5. Sep 5, 2008 ... Although the 16
> human-specific
> substitutions ?within the 546 ... ? 6.
> www.sciencemag.org/
> ?content/321/5894/1346.full??Show ?more results
> from sciencemag.org ? ? 7.
> HACNS1Human-specific gain of
> function in the HACNS1 ?enhancer ... ?it has
> experienced 16 human-
> specific nucleotide changes ?in the ~6 ?million years
> since humans
> and ... The cluster of 13 human- ?specific
> ?substitutions in 81 bp is
> also indicated. ... ? 8. ?
> www.yale.edu/noonanlab/
> Noonan_Lab/HACNS1.html - Cached ?- Similar ?
> 9. [PDF] DOI:
> 10.1126/science.1165848 , 714c (2009); 323 ?Science
> et ?al ...File
> Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View ? ?10.
> by L Duret -
> 2009 - Cited by 13 - Related articles ? ?11.
> Feb 6,
> 2009 ... Second, among the 16 substitutions in
> ?HACNS1 ?there are 14
> AT ? GC substitu- tions, 2 GC ? CG substitutions, but
> ?not ?a
> sin- ... ? 12.
> pbil.univ-lyon1.fr/members/duret/.../ ?PDF/
> 2009- ?DuretGaltier.Science.pdf ? 13.
> Brief ?communication:
> Population data support the ?adaptive ?nature ...by T
> ?Hünemeier -
> Related articles ? 14. Aug 17, 2010 ...
> ?Thirteen of these
> 16 mutations are ?found within ?an 81-bp ?functional
> .... 2010) shows
> that 8 of the 13 human specific ?HACNS1
> ?substitutions ... ?
> 15. onlinelibrary.wiley.com ? ... ? ?Journal Home
> ? Vol 143 ?Issue
> 3 ? ?Abstract ?--- end quoting Google ?hits talking
> about 16
> mutations, whereas ?Neanderthal had only ?13
> ?mutations --- ?The
> conclusion I draw, which maybe wrong, and someone
> ?should correct ?me
> if wrong, is that ?Homo sapiens had 16 total
> ?alterations in the
> HACNS1 gene whereas ?Neanderthal had only ?13
> ?alterations, meaning
> that Neanderthal was a different species than ?Homo
> sapiens because of
> those 3 alterations, but that the alterations
> ?missing in Neanderthal
> implies CroMagnon was superior in Throwing ?whether
> throwing rocks or
> stones or spears. And that ?superiority of ?throwing
> is the likely
> cause of extinction of ?Neanderthal. ?It is ?likely
> that the last
> places on Earth for Neanderthal were the ?caves ?in
> Spain of high
> ground, so the higher ground could have ?sheltered
> ?them longer from
> the superior throwing ?of the encroaching CroMagnon.
> ?To throw down
> from higher ground tends ?to equalize a superior
> ?throwing opponent.
> Now I think that Mr. Paabo and Mr. Noonan should
> ?have made more
> fanfare over the differences of the Neanderthal
> ?(Neandertal) HACNS1
> variation and spoken out more on that ?difference.
> Perhaps they were
> silent about HACNS1 because they seemed ?to have
> favored ?the FOXP2
> gene which deals with speech and language. ?So why
> the silence over
> the fact that Neanderthal had 3 mutations ?different
> from CroMagnon
> with the HACNS1 gene? Why the silence in the
> ?Anthropology community?
> One would think ?they should by happy and ?dancing
> and celebrating
> that their science ?is ?nearly closed and the ?first
> major science to
> be closed. I guess some ?people just do not ?like to
> close their
> science.
>
> --
> Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from
> search-engine-
> bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a
> excellent, simple and
> fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as
> seen here:
>
> http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
>
> Archimedes Plutonium
> http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
>
|
|
