|
|
Re: Go Hang Yourself, you Worthless Waste-of-F&%^ng Life
Posted:
Jan 16, 2013 1:00 PM
|
|
> On Jan 15, 5:16 am, Archimedes Plutonium
> <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 15, 4:01 am, Archimedes Plutonium
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > For it seems to me that unless we have equi-dated
> genomes, that much
> > > of what Paabo and Green and Hawks discussed in
> Decoding Neanderthal
> > > NOVA is just opinion.
Anything they do is better than anything you. When they take a dump, that floating turd is better than you, better than anything that comes from you, better than anything you will ever do.
Go kill yourself, you waste of a f*&^ing life.
> >
> > > Now do we know what genes indicate hair growth
> and what genes indicate
> > > the color of skin such as black African or white
> European?
> >
> > > So can the Neanderthal genome indicate what color
> of skin and how much
> > > hair?
> > > Can we make a comparison to a Sapiens of 33,000
> years ago as to what
> > > color of skin and how much hair?
> >
> > > It may turn out, that what Hawks found for the
> Tuscany Italy genetic
> > > indicators was the mutations of the Sapiens
> conferring immunology
> > > because they were turning to a whiter skin to
> absorb more sunlight and
> > > vitamin D. It maybe that Sapiens was even
> healthier in Europe than the
> > > existing Neanderthals. It may turn out that
> Neanderthals were prone to
> > > more sickness from the cold than the invading
> Sapiens from Africa.
> >
> > > It is puzzling as to what benefits accrued to
> Sapiens to go from a lot
> > > of hair, a hairy body to a body that is less
> hair. Does Rock throwing
> > > have more advantage with less hair than more
> hair?
> >
> > > The one place on the body that has no hair is the
> front of the hands
> > > and hair there would be a nuisance to a rock
> thrower.
> >
> > > Hair would be important for cold climate and an
> advantage. So was
> > > Neanderthal hairy or the same hair as Sapiens
> invading Europe?
> >
> > > Hair is of a disadvantage for parasites.
> >
> > > So we need some answers to the above from the
> genomes of Neanderthal
> > > of 33,000 years ago and from Sapiens that were
> contemporaries of
> > > Neanderthal.
> >
> > > Now there has been a theory going around as to
> the Swimming Sapiens as
> > > the way Sapiens lost most of their body hair and
> become the hairless
> > > ape. I do not buy that, except for one
> application.
> >
> > > How close is Tuscany to the Mediterranean Sea of
> 33,000 years ago?
> >
> > > It is possible that the African sapiens that
> invaded Europe and
> > > extincted Neanderthal were clustered in Tuscany
> and lived close to the
> > > Med. Sea. It is possible that they spent so much
> time near the Sea,
> > > that over 10,000 years they would mutate the
> genes for less hair as an
> > > advantage in swimming. How warm is the Med. Sea
> in winter in Tuscany?
> >
> > > Also, I would like to remind the reader that this
> theory of
> > > Rockthrowing starts in Italy near Sardina some 8
> to 10 million years
> > > ago with a ape creature throwing rocks to a habit
> of throwing rocks
> > > that conferred many advantages and increasing his
> mating and
> > > offspring. This throwing ape creature would
> eventually migrate into
> > > Africa, and become Orrorin. So was there a full
> land bridge between
> > > Tuscany, Sardinia and Africa?
> >
> > > I know Gilbraltor harbors monkeys from Africa? Do
> monkeys somehow find
> > > a means of crossing the Med. Sea, on perhaps logs
> adrift? Could
> > > monkeys and apes some 10 million years ago have
> made a crossing of
> > > Sicily into Northern Africa?
> > > So it would be ironic that the birthplace of
> humanity starts in
> > > Sardinia Italy some 8 to 10 million years ago and
> migrates into Africa
> > > and then some 60,000 years ago the African
> Sapiens migrated back north
> > > into Europe. So they came full circle.
> >
> > Thinking about the above, it dawned on me that the
> loss of hair, as
> > one author in the 20th century titled his book "The
> Naked Ape", but
> > the loss of hair was not due to swimming and living
> near water, but
> > rather this logical means-- how can you have white
> skin and take in
> > sunlight for Vitamin D if your body is covered in
> hair?
> >
> > Has any anatomist researched whether other animals
> take in sunlight to
> > produce Vitamin D, or is Homo sapiens unique to
> taking in sunlight for
> > Vitamin D?
> >
> > So if you had a hairy ape such as a chimpanzee or
> orangutan
> > or gorilla, could you take in sunlight and convert
> to Vitamin D for
> > health advantage?
> >
> > So the logic is, that once you have the genetics
> that converts
> > sunlight to Vitamin D, then that advantage would
> spur the genetics for
> > less hair to gain more Vitamin D. Now in the
> Tropics of Africa, loss
> > of hair would mean sunburn for there is too much
> sunlight, so for that
> > to balance out, the skin genetics favored dark
> skin.
> >
> > So here I think I found the genetic mechanism for
> loss of hair for
> > Homo sapiens to allow for Vitamin D uptake.
> >
> > Now I wonder when this took place in Homo sapiens
> history? Was it
> > 60,000 years ago or earlier? Did Neanderthal have
> less hair and
> > Vitamin D uptake?
> >
>
> Now I took a look at Wikipedia's entry of Vitamin D,
> and I do not know
> what the author had in mind when he/she snuck in the
> word "unique" for
> it makes the complex sentence obfuscating to me:
>
> --- quoting Wikipedia on Vitamin D ---
> In humans, vitamin D is unique because it can be
> ingested as
> cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) or ergocalciferol
> (vitamin D2) and
> because the body can also synthesize it (from
> cholesterol) when sun
> exposure is adequate (hence its nickname, the
> "sunshine vitamin").
> --- end quote ---
>
> I had a search of other primates and their need of
> Vitamin D so the
> use of the word "unique" is very vague in the above.
>
> But I am happy over this escapade of linking the
> evolution of hair
> loss for Homo Sapiens with that of skin color and
> Vitamin D uptake.
>
> Before, I was of no opinion as to how Homo Sapiens
> became a "Naked
> Ape". And as far as rockthrowing theory is concerned,
> loss of hair was
> an advantage so long as the hair lost was an
> impediment to throwing.
> Say the hair around the eyes, for if there was a lot
> of hair around
> the eyes could be fatal in a battle with predators or
> another tribe of
> early humans.
>
> And I suppose the Aquatic Ape theory, that our early
> ancestors lived
> mostly in a aquatic environment was a silly-theory to
> answer the hair
> loss of Homo sapiens.
>
> But now, it appears I stumbled on the correct path to
> explaining how
> or why early Homo sapiens became the "Naked Ape".
>
> I think there is a term in evolutionary biology of
> co-evolution which
> means several traits evolve together, where trait A
> is a function of
> trait B. Here the traits are 1) hair reduction 2)
> skin color 3)
> Vitamin D uptake
> 4) warmth. So we have at least four factors
> influencing one another
> and likely others not mentioned.
>
> So we have Homo sapiens moving North into Europe some
> 60,000 years ago
> and by 30,000 years ago all the Neanderthals gone
> extinct.
>
> Now was these Sapiens moving north already having
> reduction of hair or
> did they have mutations in Europe some 10,000 years
> upon arriving
> there? Well the climate is colder in Europe than in
> Africa, so the
> Sapiens would have covered up their bodies with skin
> hides to keep
> warm. That covering would mean less sunlight and less
> vitamin D. And
> were these Sapien invaders already having a dark skin
> or did they have
> a lighter skin before they moved North? Let us assume
> they had dark
> skin and after living near Tuscany Italy for 10,000
> years and wearing
> clothing that the advantage of reduction in hair and
> a whiter skin
> would help in vitamin D uptake.
>
> So let us assume that the African sapien invaders of
> Europe some
> 60,000 years ago were of dark skin and a lot more
> hair than modern day
> sapiens. That living in Europe for many thousands of
> years, especially
> around Tuscany that the genetic advantage accrued to
> those with
> mutations that would be a whiter skin with reduction
> in hair in order
> to take in more vitamin D.
>
> Now in the NOVA show, they hacked on and on about
> Neanderthal
> interbreeding with Sapiens to confer extra health
> immunity to European
> diseases. One has to wonder, though, whether
> Neanderthal was more
> white skinned than the invading sapiens? And one has
> to wonder whether
> the Sapiens just evolved towards a whiter skin,
> reduction in hair
> without ever any Neanderthal interbreeding.
>
> --
> Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from
> search-engine-
> bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a
> excellent, simple and
> fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as
> seen here:
>
> http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
>
> Archimedes Plutonium
> http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
>
|
|
