> On Jan 10, 6:18 am, benj <b...@iwaynet.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:33:28 -0800, Archimedes > Plutonium wrote: > > > > > It's called "politics", Archie. > > Do not overlook the intrusion of religion in > Neanderthal research. > > Mistakes of logic by Svante Paabo and Ed Green #187 > Rockthrowing > theory book > > Now I was looking for the transcript because I > remember there was a > third scientist involved and confused with logical > reasoning. The > third scientist layed out some red beads on the > geography table and > piled the beads up in Tuscany Italy saying that the > Tuscany is the > hotbed of Neanderthal and Homo sapiens interbreeding.
I hear you interbreed with anyone around, men woman, animal, whatever is around.
> > Now the logical flaws of Paabo and Green are very > evident in that they > focused on just one gene FOXP2 and when they found > the gene identical > in Sapiens and Neanderthal, they could no longer > support their pet > belief that the difference between the two species > was communication, > that the Neanderthal did not have a robust > communication. > > So then, what does Paabo and Green do? Well, they > then go on a > interbreeding escapade for the Neanderthals with the > Sapiens. > > Trouble is that, earlier Paabo had shown the world > audience that > Neanderthal was a different species than Sapiens, but > now, here that > FOXP2 was not changed, Paabo with Green go on an > interbreeding binge. > > So how can biology scientists of Paabo and Green one > year claim > different species and when their pet theory falls > apart, they then > embrace the contradiction of interbreeding, yet they > are different > species. > > So the importance of what the third scientist (was it > Hawks?) the one > that showed red beads piled on Tuscany Italy. The > importance of that, > is that the genes proffered as different from sapiens > genes and > different from African genes, is that Paabo, Green, > and Hawks (if it > was Hawks since the transcript is not available). The > trouble with > their silly assertion that those were Neanderthal > interbreeding genes, is that the obvious is more > likely to have > happened. That in the long years of Africans moving > north into > Neanderthal territory, that some of those groups or > tribes developed > mutations in those 10,000 years which was located > near Tuscany Italy > and that those mutations are what we now see as > different from the > African homo sapiens. > > So the mistake of Paabo and Green and (Hawks if it > was Hawks) is that > they are thinking those genetic changes were due to > Neanderthal > interbreeding when in all likely hood, those new > genes were mutations > of the Homo sapiens around Tuscany and not due to any > Neanderthal > interbreeding. > > But the biggest and gravest mistake of Paabo and > Green is that once > they realized FOXP2 was identical in Neanderthal and > Sapiens, they > should have dropped their silly and stupid theory of > communication and > focused on the major important gene-- HACNS1 which > directs the ability > of rock throwing. > > Noonan is a better qualified scientist than is Paabo > or Green to speak > about Neanderthal in future NOVA shows. > > Perhaps people do not like to be told that our > ancestors were horrible > and merciless killers of another species, and how > they mercilessly > stone thrown to death the Neanderthals. People of > religion probably do > not like the idea that > what made us human was killing of other animals by > means of throwing > rocks and stones. People like Paabo and others want > to sanitize and > cleanse the ancestors of humans as communication > species, but that is > not science, that is not the truth and not what > happened. What did > happen was that an ape, some 8 to 10 million years > ago started > throwing rocks and stones that conferred superb > advantage to that > individual in killing rivals, in killing food and > having more mates > and more offspring. > > Give the job of spokesman for the next NOVA on > Neanderthal, give that > to Noonan to be the lead researcher for we need to > know about HACNS1, > not the pathetic FOXP2. > > -- > Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from > search-engine- > bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a > excellent, simple and > fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as > seen here: > > http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 > > Archimedes Plutonium > ?http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium > whole entire Universe is just one big atom > ?where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies