On 17 Jan., 08:42, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote:
> In a similar way it seems to be > impossible for Mückenheim to grasp something actually (not in the > always-growing sense) countably infinite without a boundary at the far end.
Not at all! I consider and vivdly imagine the actually infinite set of all terminating decimal representations of the reals containg all natural numbers as indices. Alas I cannot imagine that there is another decimal representations of the reals which deviates from all of them. Can you?