|
|
Re: WMatheology § 191
Posted:
Jan 17, 2013 5:52 AM
|
|
On 17 Jan., 08:42, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote:
> In a similar way it seems to be
> impossible for Mückenheim to grasp something actually (not in the
> always-growing sense) countably infinite without a boundary at the far end.
Not at all! I consider and vivdly imagine the actually infinite set of
all terminating decimal representations of the reals containg all
natural numbers as indices. Alas I cannot imagine that there is
another decimal representations of the reals which deviates from all
of them. Can you?
Regards, WM
|
|
