On 1/17/2013 4:52 AM, WM wrote: > On 17 Jan., 08:42, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote: > >> In a similar way it seems to be >> impossible for Mückenheim to grasp something actually (not in the >> always-growing sense) countably infinite without a boundary at the far end. > > Not at all! I consider and vivdly imagine the actually infinite set of > all terminating decimal representations of the reals containg all > natural numbers as indices. Alas I cannot imagine that there is > another decimal representations of the reals which deviates from all > of them. Can you?
Then, do irrational numbers exist transiently on a problem by problem basis? (Vacuum energy numbers)