> But, in failing to provide reasonable > alternatives (that is the hard part), you > do nothing constructive.
I need not be oviparous in order to recognize a rotten egg. I show: Cantor's "proof" is based upon finite initial segments solely. So he proves that there are uncountably many terminating decimal representations. The infinity of the used strings is but abracadabra.
> You, however, simply whine.
I am not in position to save the world of mathematics. But I can show where it has gone astray.