The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Lovelock and Rund: Star shaped set of points on a manifold
Replies: 7   Last Post: Jan 17, 2013 2:39 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

Posts: 3,473
Registered: 12/4/04
Re: Lovelock and Rund: Star shaped set of points on a manifold
Posted: Jan 17, 2013 2:39 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In <>, on 01/16/2013
at 02:06 PM, Hetware <> said:

>I'm having a bit of trouble grasping that concept. Let's take R^2,
>for example. I choose a point in the middle of my paper, and call
>it {0,0}. I now declare it to be a member of some open set U.
>The smallest possible U is some infinitesimal open disk centered
>on P.

What do you mean by "infinitesimal" and how is a disk with half the
radius not smaller?

>So am I correct in understanding that the "star shaped" set U is the
> infinitesimal disk centered on P, with parametrized curves
>radiating infinitesimally from P?

>Is any ball with x^i < 1 a permissible choice for U?

Not only that, but so is any other open ball containing P. However,
the definition of star shaped is more general; U need not be an open
ball, or even convex.

What definition does the book give?

Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <>

Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.