Virgil
Posts:
4,661
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: WMatheology � 191
Posted:
Jan 17, 2013 5:29 PM
|
|
In article
<c41208b9-d34b-4fe4-b575-aa21c57341e9@p17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 17 Jan., 18:30, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>
> > But, in failing to provide reasonable
> > alternatives (that is the hard part), you
> > do nothing constructive.
>
> I need not be oviparous in order to recognize a rotten egg. I show:
> Cantor's "proof" is based upon finite initial segments solely. So he
> proves that there are uncountably many terminating decimal
> representations. The infinity of the used strings is but abracadabra.
Anyone who misreads Cantor's "diagoan;" argument so totally, is both a
knave and a fool.
>
> > You, however, simply whine.
>
> I am not in position to save the world of mathematics.
Certainly not so long as you seek to destroy it, as you do.
> But I can show
> where it has gone astray.
Curious that so many real mathematicians disagree with WM on that issue,
and so few real mathematicians (none at last count) agree with WM.
--
|
|
