> On 17 Jan., 18:30, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > >> But, in failing to provide reasonable >> alternatives (that is the hard part), you >> do nothing constructive. > > I need not be oviparous in order to recognize a rotten egg. I show: > Cantor's "proof" is based upon finite initial segments solely. So he > proves that there are uncountably many terminating decimal > representations. The infinity of the used strings is but abracadabra. > >> You, however, simply whine. > > I am not in position to save the world of mathematics. But I can show > where it has gone astray.
So far, that is during the last 10 years or so, you could only show how stupid you are.