|
|
Re: WMatheology § 191
Posted:
Jan 18, 2013 1:41 AM
|
|
WM wrote:
> On 17 Jan., 18:30, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>
>> But, in failing to provide reasonable
>> alternatives (that is the hard part), you
>> do nothing constructive.
>
> I need not be oviparous in order to recognize a rotten egg. I show:
> Cantor's "proof" is based upon finite initial segments solely. So he
> proves that there are uncountably many terminating decimal
> representations. The infinity of the used strings is but abracadabra.
>
>> You, however, simply whine.
>
> I am not in position to save the world of mathematics. But I can show
> where it has gone astray.
So far, that is during the last 10 years or so, you could only show how
stupid you are.
|
|
