The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: ZFC really really really sucks -- really!
Replies: 20   Last Post: Jan 20, 2013 6:30 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Frederick Williams

Posts: 2,164
Registered: 10/4/10
Re: ZFC really really really sucks -- really!
Posted: Jan 20, 2013 6:23 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Dan Christensen wrote:

> I think you need a powerset axiom to formally construct the set of functions mapping a given set to another -- e.g. the set of continuous functions on the reals. Isn't that important to be able to do?

Some might believe that physicists (for example) don't need continuous
functions on the reals. To which some might reply that it depends what
you mean by 'need'. Perhaps there are no physical phenomena that are
continuous functions on the reals*, but there are things that (to date,
at least) are best treated as if they were continuous functions on the

* I have no opinion on that myself.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by
this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.
Jonathan Swift: Thoughts on Various Subjects, Moral and Diverting

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.