Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: CONVERSION OF INNOCENT PEOPLE TO EINSTEIN BELIEVERS
Replies: 2   Last Post: Jan 21, 2013 7:02 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Pentcho Valev

Posts: 3,325
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: CONVERSION OF INNOCENT PEOPLE TO EINSTEIN BELIEVERS
Posted: Jan 20, 2013 6:50 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Merciless destruction of scientific rationality:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toGH5BdgRZ4
Leonard Susskind: "If you combine the two things together - that the laws of physics are the same in every reference frame, and that it's a law of physics that light moves with a certain velocity - you come to the conclusion that light must move with the same velocity in every reference frame. Why? Because the principle of relativity says the laws of physics are the same in every reference frame, and Einstein announced that it's a law of physics that light moves with a certain velocity."

http://o.castera.free.fr/pdf/Chronogeometrie.pdf
Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond: "Il se pourrait même que de futures mesures mettent en évidence une masse infime, mais non-nulle, du photon ; la lumière alors n'irait plus à la "vitesse de la lumière", ou, plus précisément, la vitesse de la lumière, désormais variable, ne s'identifierait plus à la vitesse limite invariante. Les procédures opérationnelles mises en jeu par le "second postulat" deviendraient caduques ipso facto. La théorie elle-même en serait-elle invalidée ? Heureusement, il n'en est rien..."

http://o.castera.free.fr/pdf/One_more_derivation.pdf
Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond: "The evidence of the nonzero mass of the photon would not, as such, shake in any way the validity of the special relalivity. It would, however, nullify all its derivations which are based on the invariance of the photon velocity."

Pentcho Valev



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.