Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: CONVERSION OF INNOCENT PEOPLE TO EINSTEIN BELIEVERS
Posted:
Jan 20, 2013 6:50 PM
|
|
Merciless destruction of scientific rationality:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toGH5BdgRZ4
Leonard Susskind: "If you combine the two things together - that the laws of physics are the same in every reference frame, and that it's a law of physics that light moves with a certain velocity - you come to the conclusion that light must move with the same velocity in every reference frame. Why? Because the principle of relativity says the laws of physics are the same in every reference frame, and Einstein announced that it's a law of physics that light moves with a certain velocity."
http://o.castera.free.fr/pdf/Chronogeometrie.pdf
Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond: "Il se pourrait même que de futures mesures mettent en évidence une masse infime, mais non-nulle, du photon ; la lumière alors n'irait plus à la "vitesse de la lumière", ou, plus précisément, la vitesse de la lumière, désormais variable, ne s'identifierait plus à la vitesse limite invariante. Les procédures opérationnelles mises en jeu par le "second postulat" deviendraient caduques ipso facto. La théorie elle-même en serait-elle invalidée ? Heureusement, il n'en est rien..."
http://o.castera.free.fr/pdf/One_more_derivation.pdf
Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond: "The evidence of the nonzero mass of the photon would not, as such, shake in any way the validity of the special relalivity. It would, however, nullify all its derivations which are based on the invariance of the photon velocity."
Pentcho Valev
|
|
|
|
