Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: review and question
Replies: 13   Last Post: Jan 27, 2013 11:46 AM

 Search Thread: Advanced Search

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Daniel Knaisch Posts: 32 Registered: 2/17/11
Re: review and question
Posted: Jan 20, 2013 9:41 PM
 Plain Text Reply

You're getting too picky TK

Dan

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 20, 2013, at 9:09 PM, "Mark Burfield" <mburfiel@elmiracityschools.com> wrote:

> Huh
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jan 20, 2013, at 5:32 PM, "TKENYON@crcs.wnyric.org<mailto:TKENYON@crcs.wnyric.org>" <TKENYON@crcs.wnyric.org<mailto:TKENYON@crcs.wnyric.org>> wrote:
>
> The question first:
> In Algebra 2, during review, I ran into a few older Regents exam questions about the discriminant. Why, if the discriminant is negative, do you get "two imaginary roots"? You don't. You get two complex roots; imaginary numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. 3+2i is NOT an imaginary number. Why the shift from correct vocabulary in one unit (A2.N.8 Determine the conjugate of a complex number) to incorrect vocabulary in another unit? Example: Jan 2011, #2.
>
> And, I know that the quantity of stuff in the core has been pointed out before, but this weekend, I really thought "wow." I did three separate 4 hour review sessions for students in Algebra, Geometry, and Algebra 2. Relatively good students (as if that needed to be said - 4 hours of review on a Sat or Sunday?) But, Geometry: started at G.G.1, covered every one of them through G.G.74 - 100% of course in 4 hours, almost on the dot, including one full Regents, and every proof since 2005. Algebra - had to take a couple breaks with the one year younger students. Still, from A.N.1 through whatever it goes to, we hit about 90% of them, plus a full Regents exam. Algebra 2... This was the 3rd weekend that I did 4 hours of review with them. TWELVE hours of review, and we're close, but not quite through 100% of the core indicators.
>
>
>
> -Tom Kenyon
> ******************************************************************* * To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message * "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to majordomo@mathforum.org<mailto:majordomo@mathforum.org> * * Read prior posts and download attachments from the web archives at * http://mathforum.org/kb/forum.jspa?forumIDg1 *******************************************************************
> *******************************************************************
> * To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message
> * "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to majordomo@mathforum.org
> *
> * Read prior posts and download attachments from the web archives at
> * http://mathforum.org/kb/forum.jspa?forumID=671
> *******************************************************************

*******************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message
* "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to majordomo@mathforum.org
*
* Read prior posts and download attachments from the web archives at
* http://mathforum.org/kb/forum.jspa?forumID=671
*******************************************************************

Date Subject Author
1/20/13 Tom Kenyon
1/20/13 Mark Burfield
1/20/13 Daniel Knaisch
1/22/13 Betty Worthington
1/22/13 Kathleen Cefalo
1/22/13 Brian Grayson
1/27/13 NFSSTAR@aol.com
1/20/13 Eleanor Pupko
1/21/13 Adam Wittenstein
1/21/13 Tom Kenyon
1/25/13 Nick B
1/25/13 Nick B
1/25/13 Nick B
1/25/13 Nick B

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.