The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Professional Associations » nyshsmath

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: review and question
Replies: 13   Last Post: Jan 27, 2013 11:46 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Eleanor Pupko

Posts: 426
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: review and question
Posted: Jan 20, 2013 10:43 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (2.6 K)

Probably to distinguish from strictly real roots which are also a subset of the complex numbers.

Eleanor Pupko

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 20, 2013, at 5:31 PM, wrote:

> The question first:
> In Algebra 2, during review, I ran into a few older Regents exam questions about the discriminant. Why, if the discriminant is negative, do you get "two imaginary roots"? You don't. You get two complex roots; imaginary numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. 3+2i is NOT an imaginary number. Why the shift from correct vocabulary in one unit (A2.N.8 Determine the conjugate of a complex number) to incorrect vocabulary in another unit? Example: Jan 2011, #2.
> And, I know that the quantity of stuff in the core has been pointed out before, but this weekend, I really thought "wow." I did three separate 4 hour review sessions for students in Algebra, Geometry, and Algebra 2. Relatively good students (as if that needed to be said - 4 hours of review on a Sat or Sunday?) But, Geometry: started at G.G.1, covered every one of them through G.G.74 - 100% of course in 4 hours, almost on the dot, including one full Regents, and every proof since 2005. Algebra - had to take a couple breaks with the one year younger students. Still, from A.N.1 through whatever it goes to, we hit about 90% of them, plus a full Regents exam. Algebra 2... This was the 3rd weekend that I did 4 hours of review with them. TWELVE hours of review, and we're close, but not quite through 100% of the core indicators.
> -Tom Kenyon
> ******************************************************************* * To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message * "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to * * Read prior posts and download attachments from the web archives at * *******************************************************************

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.