On Jan 21, 2013, at 8:21 AM, GS Chandy <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Given that this problem takes very little time to >> solve (especially in a group), and that the students >> had considerable time to solve it, and didn't, all >> the scratch work will show is that the students where >> lost at step 1. Or, in your words, most students >> "guessed" wrong, and a couple students weren't >> exactly "guessing". >> >> Bob Hansen >> > So in what way is your 'response' actually responding to any of the substantive issues about learning that had been raised? A copy of the points raised is pasted below my signature for ready reference.
I was pointing out that you two are lost at step 1.:)