Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.symbolic.independent

Topic: A bug in Reduce package 'algint'?
Replies: 9   Last Post: Feb 1, 2013 6:02 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Axel Vogt

Posts: 1,033
Registered: 5/5/07
Re: A bug in Reduce package 'algint'?
Posted: Jan 21, 2013 4:16 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 21.01.2013 19:55, clicliclic@freenet.de wrote:
>
> Wanting to refresh my knowledge of the capabilties of the Reduce algebra
> system, I have recently browsed the website. The system comes with the
> 'algint' package by J. Davenport which boosts the integrator
> capabilities for algebraic functions. The package documentation
>
> <http://www.reduce-algebra.com/docs/algint.pdf>
>
> introduces the example integrand sqrt(sqrt(a^2 + x^2) + x)/x. A correct
> antiderivative for this is
>
> 2*(sqrt(sqrt(a^2 + x^2) + x)
> - sqrt(a)*atanh(sqrt(sqrt(a^2 + x^2) + x)/sqrt(a))
> - sqrt(a)*atan(sqrt(sqrt(a^2 + x^2) + x)/sqrt(a)))
>
> The antiderivative printed in the documentation, however, is either very
> wrong or garbled beyond recognition.
>
> Martin.


Maple 16 returns 2*sqrt(2*x)*hypergeom([-1/4, -1/4, 1/4],[1/2, 3/4],-a^2/x^2)
May be right, but not that 'usefull' w.r.t. your result





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.