On 01/22/2013 05:38 PM, Mr. Anchovy wrote: > In article<email@example.com>, > Timothy Murphy<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >> Mr. Anchovy wrote: >> >>>> Then: they begin to introduce "ads" - they are conceptually >>>> made *to catch* attention - and that's what they do! >>>> So, even and explicitely intentionally, this disrupts >>>> my concentration on the contents of the mathematical discourse. >> >>> It is the price to be paid to get away from kooks and cranks: >>> powerful kooks and cranks >> >> I don't see why. >> They appear to me to be two orthogonal forms of annoyance. > > Do not understand "orthogonal" here. My point is that > you choose who is going to annoy you, because we do not > escape it. Once, long ago, I read in a book on > morphology a catalogue of observable phenomena that > could be used to define life. I forgot all of them > except "irritability." We are not alive unless we are > irritable.
I heard that a survey of medical doctors showed anaesthesia as one of the top advances in medicine, according to the doctors ...
-- dracut:/# lvm vgcfgrestore File descriptor 9 (/.console_lock) leaked on lvm invocation. Parent PID 993: sh Please specify a *single* volume group to restore.