In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 23 Jan., 17:40, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote: > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes: > > > > Try to find the difference between the Binary Trees. That should open > > > your eyes. > > > > Why not finish our discussion of N first? Why must you change the > > subject? > > The reason is that you uniquely can understand what I meant.
Other than any other poor souls trapped in his WMYTHEOLOGY, nobody can understand what WM mans.
> Further > it is not at all difficult to argue in the Binary Tree.
It is for someone like WM who does not have a clue about how Complete Infinite Binary Trees work.
> And finally it > is just the same question if you consider the levels of the Binary > Tree. Enumerate the levels by the natural numbers and find that there > is a difference between all FISs of levels and the actually infinite > number aleph_0 of levels.
That is the difference between a set and its cardinality, which outside of WMytheology is perfectly clear.
> Or better: recognize that you cannot find a > difference - although the number of paths in the respective trees > differs by more than the abyss of infinity.
They only abyss of note here is the abyss of WN's unhappy concatination of arrogance and ignorance. --