In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 23 Jan., 18:09, David Bernier <david...@videotron.ca> wrote: > > > Naturally, I'll grant that here, "Binary Trees" is irrelevant ! > > to the question of ZF consistency ... > > Understand the Binary Tree. After you will have understood it, you > will understand, why it is relevant for ZF.
Once WM understands Complete Infinite Binary Trees, which at present he totally does not, he will realize how wrong he has been about them.
WM claims Complete Infinite Binary Trees having finite paths and no more than countably many of them, neither of which is possible in a true Complete Infinite Binary Tree. --