The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: honeycombs
Replies: 9   Last Post: Jan 24, 2013 5:40 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Rich Delaney

Posts: 392
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: honeycombs
Posted: Jan 23, 2013 5:27 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Jan 22, Salmon Egg <> wrote:
> > > I saw a news item about a new technique to draw CO2 from
> > > the atmosphere.  It's a chemical process, using amines,
> > > which binds with the molecule, coated on a large structure,
> > > in the shape of a honeycomb.

> > > According to the story, this maximizes surface area.
> > > ok, mathematicians, which function gets optimized by a
> > > honeycomb?  What are the constraints and assumptions?

> > 2D problem to *minimise* the surface area to occupy a given volume. Bees
> > use it to make honeycomb with the least amount of wax.

> > It is not difficult to show that the angle between sides must be 120
> > degrees and that equal lengths minimise total length/area occupied.

> > They have the structure just about as wrong as it is possible to be
> > unless the stuff they are making it out of is extremely precious.

> > The 3D problem to occupy volume with a foam of minimum surface area is
> > far more interesting and gives rise to Plateau's laws of soap films. The
> > Kelvin foam structure was optimal until fairly recently when
> > Weare-Phelan discovered a 3% better solution using a pair of shapes. A
> > whole new family has been found but as yet a proof of optimality eludes.

> This concept of honeycomb is crazy. True, the area of the honeycomb is a
> relativity efficient way of getting large reactive area to convert CO2
> to something that can be safely sequestered.
> How are you going to get the zillions of tons of amines the OP thought
> would be a suitable reactant? How much CO2 is sent into the atmosphere
> to prepare the amines? The honeycomb math problem is a red or even
> infrared herring.

The chemistry, I don't know. I was asking about
the optimization problem.

Anyhow, the inventor, Global Thermostat, has funding,
and a working prototype.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.