The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: "Building an Innovation-Based Economy" (Brookings Institution Study)
Replies: 3   Last Post: Jan 24, 2013 8:56 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
GS Chandy

Posts: 8,307
From: Hyderabad, Mumbai/Bangalore, India
Registered: 9/29/05
Re: "Building an Innovation-Based Economy" (Brookings Institution Study)
Posted: Jan 24, 2013 1:37 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Reference the Brookings Institution Study "Smart Policy: Building an Innovation-Based Economy" (
and my posts commenting on it at:


ii); and

iii) ] -

the issue of "building an 'Innovation-Based Economy'" is actually, in one sense, far simpler than it may seem to be at first glance.

There are just a couple of quite simple things to do to accomplish such an economy, as briefly explained below:

Innovation in society is obviously completely based on the ideas that the people in society may have on the variety of issues that confront them. Therefore, the primary need is for:

A: A practical means to collect, and then easily to view and (continuingly) review all the ideas that people may have.

On viewing and reviewing the available ideas, the people in the society under consideration need:

B: A practical means to decide, amongst all the ideas available, which ideas would give the most 'economic leverage' in regard to the aim of "Building an Innovation-Based Economy". This has clearly to be done on a continuing basis.

Both 'A' and 'B' noted above are readily accomplished through application of a tool called the 'One Page Management System' (OPMS), information about which is available in the attachments to my message at: .

It DOES take some (a very little) learning and some (a fair bit of) 'unlearning' to apply this tool to real-life issues.

For instance, the user must clearly understand the 'potential value' of his/her own ideas AND the 'potential value' of others' ideas relative to the issue under consideration.

It takes some doing to actually do the needed 'unlearning' so that one comes to understand the real value of ideas - one's own ideas and others' ideas. Our 'traditional educational systems' (which have schooled all our minds) have long taught us to ignore the value of ideas (our own as well others' ideas); it takes a while to 'unlearn' this non- constructive way of thinking - in fact it is actually a very destructive way of thinking.

For instance, for a very long while, Robert Hansen (RH) and a couple of others at Math-teach were fervently making the totally false claim - notwithstanding sizable evidence introduced - to the effect that the OPMS is merely a tool for "list-making" and it is therefore (or so they claimed) totally trivial.

I believe RH is STILL making this ridiculous claim! That his claim is totally false is easily seen by anyone who would examine the attachments to my message at

("Still Shoveling!")

Message was edited by: GS Chandy

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.