On 24 Jan., 21:25, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <c019df5f-3754-4b99-a5e9-491faed85...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > On 24 Jan., 09:32, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > In article > > > <395bea71-7f73-49dc-94d0-5a422088d...@z8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>, > > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > The following is copied from Mathematics StackExchange and > > > > MathOverflow. Small wonder that the sources have been deleted already. > > > > > How can we distinguish between that infinite Binary Tree that contains > > > > only all finite initial segments of the infinite paths and that > > > > complete infinite Binary Tree that in addition also contains all > > > > infinite paths? > > > > WM also distinguishes between the union of all finite initial segments > > > of |N and |N itself, > > > Is the set of all terminating decimal expansions of real numbers of > > the unit interval not a set? > > It is not a set in WMytheology, according to WM's prior posts.
Of course in my system there are no complete infinite set. Here I ask a set theorist.