|
|
Re: Matheology � 198
Posted:
Jan 24, 2013 6:24 PM
|
|
"WM" <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message
news:ffa65fc4-039a-498e-a17c-ffaf6df47af4@n8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On 24 Jan., 21:25, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> <c019df5f-3754-4b99-a5e9-491faed85...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > On 24 Jan., 09:32, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <395bea71-7f73-49dc-94d0-5a422088d...@z8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > > The following is copied from Mathematics StackExchange and
> > > > MathOverflow. Small wonder that the sources have been deleted
> > > > already.
>
> > > > How can we distinguish between that infinite Binary Tree that
> > > > contains
> > > > only all finite initial segments of the infinite paths and that
> > > > complete infinite Binary Tree that in addition also contains all
> > > > infinite paths?
>
> > > WM also distinguishes between the union of all finite initial segments
> > > of |N and |N itself,
>
>> > Is the set of all terminating decimal expansions of real numbers of
>> > the unit interval not a set?
>>
> It is not a set in WMytheology, according to WM's prior posts.
>
>Of course in my system there are no complete infinite set. Here I ask
>a set theorist.
>Regards, WM
in your system are there infinitely completed sets ?
|
|
