In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 24 Jan., 21:25, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > In article > > <c019df5f-3754-4b99-a5e9-491faed85...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > On 24 Jan., 09:32, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > In article > > > > <395bea71-7f73-49dc-94d0-5a422088d...@z8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > The following is copied from Mathematics StackExchange and > > > > > MathOverflow. Small wonder that the sources have been deleted already. > > > > > > > How can we distinguish between that infinite Binary Tree that contains > > > > > only all finite initial segments of the infinite paths and that > > > > > complete infinite Binary Tree that in addition also contains all > > > > > infinite paths? > > > > > > WM also distinguishes between the union of all finite initial segments > > > > of |N and |N itself, > > > > > Is the set of all terminating decimal expansions of real numbers of > > > the unit interval not a set? > > > > It is not a set in WMytheology, according to WM's prior posts. > > Of course in my system there are no complete infinite set. Here I ask > a set theorist. > > Regards, WM
Then why does WM keep talking about them if they do not even exist in his world of WMYTHEOLOGY?
WM also keeps talking about complete infinite binary trees, and asking others to learn to understand WM's complete infinite binary trees even though in his WM's WMYTHEOLOGICAL world there cannot be anything at all like a complete infinite binary tree, nor any other sort of actually infinite set, which WM says does not exist in his WMYTHEOLOGY. --