The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Professional Associations » nyshsmath

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: review and question
Replies: 13   Last Post: Jan 27, 2013 11:46 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Nick B

Posts: 96
Registered: 9/23/07
Re: review and question
Posted: Jan 25, 2013 1:38 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Tom is correct in saying that 3 + 2i is complex and not imaginary in today's vocabulary. I always found the Regents curriculum faulty in this area. Imaginary numbers are complex numbers whose real part is zero. To use the term "non-real roots" would be much clearer. However, the ambiguity here is borne out in the history of the topic, as the Italian mathematician Cardano called complex numbers "fictitious" and I believe Descartes made no distinction between imaginary and complex numbers when he introduced the term "imaginary". One could also argue the term "imaginary" has unwanted implications and thus is not desirable, but it seems as though we're stuck with it.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.