Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 198
Replies: 40   Last Post: Jan 26, 2013 6:54 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de Posts: 18,076 Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 198
Posted: Jan 25, 2013 2:36 AM

On 25 Jan., 01:04, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
>
>
>
>
>
>  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > On 24 Jan., 21:25, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > In article

>
> > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > > On 24 Jan., 09:32, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > > In article
> > > > > <395bea71-7f73-49dc-94d0-5a422088d...@z8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,

>
> > > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > > > > The following is copied from Mathematics StackExchange and
> > > > > > MathOverflow. Small wonder that the sources have been deleted already.

>
> > > > > > How can we distinguish between that infinite Binary Tree that contains
> > > > > > only all finite initial segments of the infinite paths and that
> > > > > > complete infinite Binary Tree that in addition also contains all
> > > > > > infinite paths?

>
> > > > > WM also distinguishes between the union of all finite initial segments
> > > > > of |N and |N itself,

>
> > > > Is the set of all terminating decimal expansions of real numbers of
> > > > the unit interval not a set?

>
> > > It is not a set in WMytheology, according to WM's prior posts.
>
> > Of course in my system there are no complete infinite sets. Here I ask
> > a set theorist.

>
> Then why does WM keep talking about them if they do not even exist in
> his world of WMYTHEOLOGY?

Simply in order to show that they do not exist anywhere. It is like