Virgil
Posts:
4,483
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Matheology � 198
Posted:
Jan 25, 2013 3:01 AM
|
|
In article
<acec9293-0e58-4d7a-809a-709d790881fc@k4g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 25 Jan., 01:04, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <ffa65fc4-039a-498e-a17c-ffaf6df47...@n8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > On 24 Jan., 21:25, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <c019df5f-3754-4b99-a5e9-491faed85...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > > > On 24 Jan., 09:32, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > <395bea71-7f73-49dc-94d0-5a422088d...@z8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > > > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > > > > > The following is copied from Mathematics StackExchange and
> > > > > > > MathOverflow. Small wonder that the sources have been deleted
> > > > > > > already.
> >
> > > > > > > How can we distinguish between that infinite Binary Tree that
> > > > > > > contains
> > > > > > > only all finite initial segments of the infinite paths and that
> > > > > > > complete infinite Binary Tree that in addition also contains all
> > > > > > > infinite paths?
> >
> > > > > > WM also distinguishes between the union of all finite initial
> > > > > > segments
> > > > > > of |N and |N itself,
> >
> > > > > Is the set of all terminating decimal expansions of real numbers of
> > > > > the unit interval not a set?
> >
> > > > It is not a set in WMytheology, according to WM's prior posts.
> >
> > > Of course in my system there are no complete infinite sets. Here I ask
> > > a set theorist.
> >
> > Then why does WM keep talking about them if they do not even exist in
> > his world of WMYTHEOLOGY?
>
> Simply in order to show that they do not exist anywhere.
They exist in a lot of places outside of WMytheology and a good deal of
very useful and interesting mathematics would not be possible without
them.
> talking about a fraction sqrt(5).
--
|
|
