Virgil
Posts:
4,482
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Matheology � 198
Posted:
Jan 25, 2013 7:26 PM
|
|
In article
<8538ae2e-7636-4dc9-9034-3de579250115@u16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 25 Jan., 09:07, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 25, 8:57 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >
> > "Write a sequence like xxxxxxxxxx... and do never stop"
> >
> > Perfectly acceptable finite description of an infinite sequence.
>
> Of course, nothing however that could be diagonalized in a Cantor-list
If the meaning of each x were known, as in a constant sequence, and the
position of the sequence in the Cantor-list were known, whyever not?
> or could be the result of diagonalization.
Why not the result of a diagonalization, given the list from which it
was to be created??
--
|
|
