In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 25 Jan., 09:07, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jan 25, 8:57 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > "Write a sequence like xxxxxxxxxx... and do never stop" > > > > Perfectly acceptable finite description of an infinite sequence. > > Of course, nothing however that could be diagonalized in a Cantor-list
If the meaning of each x were known, as in a constant sequence, and the position of the sequence in the Cantor-list were known, whyever not?
> or could be the result of diagonalization.
Why not the result of a diagonalization, given the list from which it was to be created?? --