|
|
Re: WMatheology § 200
Posted:
Jan 26, 2013 4:11 AM
|
|
On 26 Jan., 09:31, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> <0d063360-6dc5-4990-ba73-0400ce6c1...@w8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
>
> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > Matheology 200
>
> > We know that the real numbers of set theory are very different from
> > the real numbers of analysis, at least most of them, because we cannot
> > use them. But it seems, that also the natural numbers of analysis 1,
> > 2, 3, ... are different from the cardinal numbers 1, 2, 3, ...
>
> The natural numbers of analysis are members of the set of real numbers,
Here I know of a difference: The collection of real numbers in
analysis is countable and is therefore not the a of set theory.
> but cardinal numbers are not members of the set of real numbers.
Here I don't know of a difference in the finite domain. Can you help?
Regards, WM
|
|
