Virgil
Posts:
4,479
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Matheology � 200
Posted:
Jan 26, 2013 6:00 PM
|
|
In article
<ee0c4a5b-746b-4df7-a40a-00d6448f0cfa@u7g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> Perhaps that would be possible in set theory, but not in analysis. In
> analysis we have the set of digits of the limit L and we have the set
> of indexes of these digits. The set of indexes is 1 + the decadic
> logarithm of L.
Unless L is an integral power of 10, log_10(L) is not an integer,
so (1 + the decadic logarithm) of L cannot be the number of indices.
--
|
|
