In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Perhaps that would be possible in set theory, but not in analysis. In > analysis we have the set of digits of the limit L and we have the set > of indexes of these digits. The set of indexes is 1 + the decadic > logarithm of L.
Unless L is an integral power of 10, log_10(L) is not an integer, so (1 + the decadic logarithm) of L cannot be the number of indices. --